Comcom Community

The circle-way-people could create the circle-way-comcom

Please help now if you can

We, the circle-way-people could create a comcom (circle-way-comcom), in which we are the c-holders, but only after we made the fundamental decision for how much is the "d"¹ of that comcom . Here is as an example: We could create 2 ComCom: The ComComX (of which d=1 as it is defined here) and the ComComY of which d<1, where ComComX is a p-holder or a c-holder in ComComY².

For our comcom to be the owner of the proprieties A,B,C etc, we could, but only as d<1, offer holding as p-holders in our comcom also to the proprieties' owners a,b,c etc³ and we could be doing so proportionally to the value of the property they are to put in our comcom and in consideration to the value we (as c-holders) would put in it and all that in the boundaries of the "d" we already set for our comcom.

Footnotes

1. As "d"*100 is the parentage of the part held by all c-holders and as each c-holder own equal number of shares in that comcom.

2. So that we could cooperate with other friendly communities of which each ComCom is another c-holder and as such be together and always protected from takeover by our partners which now may be land owner, banks, state etc, or as p-holders in ComComY we could simply liberate land for use of other communities

3. p-holders are "normal" owners of shares in our comcom, but only as the shares they own are not from the part owned together by all of us being the c-holders and as the p-holders are other than us the c-holders. And so, while still holding the majority in our comcom, we could consider 0.5<d<1, for allowing partnership with p-holders being "those" against which we are normally and daily, but individually, strangling, for now better concentrating our power in-front of them and for now strangling in our structure and within our rules fitting to our needs as clear as we could present them to ourselves by listening one to another.

"those" meaning here: The banks, land-owners, state, others who generally we used to name as the "system" etc or all those whom we meet in-front of us in what we already know about the ancient Roman or any other Empire, when, for practising their occupation upon us, they must continue doing this: "First separate and then by confusing control".

All the above could be used by us for better and for more practicing our ownership in the real world as we meet it today and for not only reacting to or only disconnecting from that "system", while already establishing the system we desire.

In addition, if we believe and could prove that our number as c-holders could be increased, we could make even better deal: For more about that and about calculating the market value in the event of exit and entrance of c-holders in any comcom please see in the Practical calculation "So let's have an example" in the http://is-with.wikidot.com/arguments-specific-arguments .